Twitter update week 4
- Vicky Ouyang
- Apr 22, 2021
- 1 min read
While doing this week's Twitter assignments, I found that everyone loves furry little babies!! When I tweet about my cats, there are far more replies and likes than my other tweets. There's one thing I want to say about cats. Many people are discriminate against cats, probably without notice that. In an article I read, which the title contains, does anyone "brave enough" to study cats. I mean, what that's supposed to mean? As someone who has cats as pets, I feel like the author is discriminate against my cats and myself. I'm not sure if the author did this on purpose or just because this article will get people's attention in words like this. To me, it is not okay either way.
Both Shuoqi Feng and David Ayala shared Twitter accounts that they found very useful. Edelweiss Qin mentioned cats in her blog. I really love how the blog is working so far. It makes me feel like we are in a regular classroom setting's way of teaching.
Hey Vicky, I loved your post about your cats! There were so adorable. I thinks when people use discrimination words in their article just for audiences attention. Why would they phrased that question in such a way tho? what is that articles about??
Heya Vicky! First, it's no wonder you got so more likes and responses on your cat posts, they are so cute! I explored your page a bit and I love the simplicity of it all. As for the article you were talking about, I'm also curious to know what it was about. I don't think the author meant to be offensive, rather just click-baity. But I agree that they should be careful of their titles since it can come off as insensitive.
Hey Vicky, as I was reading through your blog, I loved how your attitude was presented in those lines! I am sorry to hear that you encountered offensive view on Twitter about cats, and I think it is not polite to express certain hatred towards cats like that as well, yet I am curious about the content in that article, what is the article arguing about?